Editorial and Publishing Process

There is a great deal of information out there on scientific topics. However, whether it can be trusted or not is a key issue at present. The main question that often emerges in this aspect is about the review process adopted to screen the articles for publication. One of the most acceptable and proven process adopted in majority reputed international journals is peer reviewing.

Benefits of peer-review:

• Establishes the legitimacy of exploration based upon the expert information of different specialists in the order, consequently averting adulterated work from being acknowledged within an area of study.

• Provides significant criticism with the intention that scientists can revise and enhance their papers before Publication.

• Enables Journal editors to select the most important research findings for publication in their journals, based upon the subject, independent reviews of an expert group.

• The process of peer review is comprehended and acknowledged by the majority of researchers. The forum includes experts, those who have common area of interest, expertise and experience to evaluate the work to be published. The reviewers will be given priority utmost to reflect the appraisals of a research work and to extract the potentialities of the researcher.

Peer review process flowchart