Indicative supervision on the monetary business organizations (Banks) Case study: Iraq
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33095/jeas.v18i65.1132Keywords:
الإشراف الإشرافي, : Supervisory supervisionAbstract
Indicative supervision represents the comparison between direct intervention (acquisition, nationalism) and participation through rules.
The last financial crisis reflected our needs for different approaches of supervision consist with our goals, but the crisis reveals also number of sounds requested and pressured toward direct control (Intervention via forces) through government acquisition and nationalization.
This study attempts to deal with crisis lessons, in the field of choice between indicative and direct supervision which government authorities used to reduce the bad effect on the monetary firms.
Iraqi banks suffered from high levels of direct control from monetary authorities, so the changes and privatization on the new economic policy permit more and new banks' activities.
The study tries to test the reality and effectiveness of control through participation (seals) with comparison with direct governmental control.
Below the paper structure:
- Introduction ( opposite solutions for the crises)
- Banking supervision;
- Macro- prudential supervision.
- Micro-prudential supervision.
- Business supervision.
- The financial reform.
- Macro – indication supervision.
- Case study: suggestion for Iraqi bank supervision.
- Bank structure.
- Central bank independency.
- Monitory policy assessment.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles submitted to the journal should not have been published before in their current or substantially similar form or be under consideration for publication with another journal. Please see JEAS originality guidelines for details. Use this in conjunction with the points below about references, before submission i.e. always attribute clearly using either indented text or quote marks as well as making use of the preferred Harvard style of formatting. Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unless otherwise agreed.
The editor may make use of Turnitin software for checking the originality of submissions received.