Comparing Some of Robust the Non-Parametric Methods for Semi-Parametric Regression Models Estimation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33095/jeas.v28i132.2275Keywords:
Semi-Parametric Regression;M-Estimation;S-Estimation; Robust Semiparametric Methods; Nonparametric Estimation Method;Kernel Method., طريقة M-estimation, طريقة S-estimation , انموذج الانحدار شبه المعلمي , طرائق التقدير الحصينة , طرائق التقدير اللامعلمية الحصينة , طريقة KernelAbstract
In this research, some robust non-parametric methods were used to estimate the semi-parametric regression model, and then these methods were compared using the MSE comparison criterion, different sample sizes, levels of variance, pollution rates, and three different models were used. These methods are S-LLS S-Estimation -local smoothing, (M-LLS)M- Estimation -local smoothing, (S-NW) S-Estimation-NadaryaWatson Smoothing, and (M-NW) M-Estimation-Nadarya-Watson Smoothing.
The results in the first model proved that the (S-LLS) method was the best in the case of large sample sizes, and small sample sizes showed that the (M-LLS) method was the best, while the second model showed in general that the S-LLS method was the best in addition to the method M-LLS was the best in some cases of sample sizes and at different levels of variance. As for the third model, it was shown through the results that in most cases the S-LLS method was the best in addition to the M-LLS method which was better in some cases of sample sizes and at different levels of variance.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles submitted to the journal should not have been published before in their current or substantially similar form or be under consideration for publication with another journal. Please see JEAS originality guidelines for details. Use this in conjunction with the points below about references, before submission i.e. always attribute clearly using either indented text or quote marks as well as making use of the preferred Harvard style of formatting. Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unless otherwise agreed.
The editor may make use of Turnitin software for checking the originality of submissions received.