Evaluation of projects during the trial operation period in accordance with the cost, quality and time - applied research in the Directorate-General for the distribution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33095/jeas.v22i93.428Keywords:
التقييم ــ المشروعات ـــ فترة التشغيل التجريبي للمشروعات ــ معيار(الكلفة , الجودة, الوقت)., \ Evaluation- Projects - Experimental operation of the project period - standard (cost , Quality, Time) .Abstract
Research includes evaluation of projects implemented and which entered into trial operation period in accordance with the evaluation criteria and of (cost, quality and time) to determine the size deviations gap for the sample of projects during the years of assessment (2011-2012-2013-2014) of each of the three evaluation criteria, and then followed by a calculation the size of the overall gap to the problem based on the research problem to determine deviations from the specific implementation of each project by answering several questions to answer turns out the reasons for these deviations occur.
The importance of research Focus on the evaluation of received projects from contractors executing the project companies, by comparing the cost, quality and time, which identified them as a criterion for assessing the amount of the actual
cost and quality achieved and the time it takes to actually implement, Only in this comparison highlights the objectives of the research that highlight the role of evaluation in identifying problems encountered in the projects and the extent to which senior management of the research sample of the results of this comparison in reducing the overall size of the gap for the projects.
A researcher has reached to a number of conclusions which stands behind the cause of volume ratio deviations gap to the inefficiency of the technical and financial authorities develop the determinants of the project criterion for evaluation for use with non-followers of the scientific foundations for the development of these criteria and make the comparison that result in repeated deviations on an ongoing basis and not to work to find ways to solve them.
Recommendations of the research state in all that is necessary to solve the problems that were the cause behind the decline in financial and material rates of implementation and breadth of deviations gap, whether at the level of each of the sample projects or on the level of the size of the total gap for these projects, which focused in the adoption of the assessment as a tool to detect deviations, and took the top management of those Results mainly to the implementation of projects in the future and choosing efficient companies financially and technically by the referral of the project to ensure the implementation raise rates and reduce the size of the gap.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles submitted to the journal should not have been published before in their current or substantially similar form or be under consideration for publication with another journal. Please see JEAS originality guidelines for details. Use this in conjunction with the points below about references, before submission i.e. always attribute clearly using either indented text or quote marks as well as making use of the preferred Harvard style of formatting. Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unless otherwise agreed.
The editor may make use of Turnitin software for checking the originality of submissions received.