PART 3 New Experiments Three Factors On The Box plot, Box notch & Outlier Values
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33095/jeas.v14i49.1377Keywords:
PART 3 New Experiments Three Factors On The Box plot, Box notch & Outlier ValuesAbstract
New two experiments of the three factors, in this study were constructed to investigate the effects, of the fixed variations to the box plot on subjects' judgments of the box lengths. These two experiments were constructed as an extension to the group B experiments, the ratio experiments the experiments with two variables carried out previously by Hussin, M.M. (1989, 2006, 2007). The first experiment box notch experiment, and the second experiment outlier values experiment. Subjects were asked to judge what percentage the shorter represented of the longer length in pairs of box lengths and give an estimate of percentage, one being a standard plot and the other being of a different box lengths and also varying with respect to other elements such as, box width & box notch or box width & outlier values. When Hussin, M.M. (1989) suggested in the future research points (1, 2, 3), can take account of wider range of the variables levels and the changing length of the standard box plot effects on the subjects' perception of the box length and further investigations could be made into variations such as box notch with box length; box notch with box length; whisker length, and also outlier values with these variations. However, both experiments were used the stander box length as the middle box length levels were not used in the experiments. The results of these two experiments suggest that these variations effected the subjects' perception of box length, as a results of the interactions between box plot features by creating visual illusions as which effect the subjects ability to accurately judge box length, both experiments were run in statistics department, Baghdad University.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles submitted to the journal should not have been published before in their current or substantially similar form or be under consideration for publication with another journal. Please see JEAS originality guidelines for details. Use this in conjunction with the points below about references, before submission i.e. always attribute clearly using either indented text or quote marks as well as making use of the preferred Harvard style of formatting. Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unless otherwise agreed.
The editor may make use of Turnitin software for checking the originality of submissions received.