Evaluating the performance of Inspector General office of the Ministry of health in accordance with normative people and people results for the European excellence model EFQM 2013
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33095/jeas.v23i98.278Keywords:
: Evaluating performance , EFQM 2013.Abstract
Current research sought to evaluate the performance and results of employees in accordance with normative to people and people result for the European model of excellence EFQM 2013 quality management Foundation in the Inspector General's Office/Ministry of health, so as to pursue a modern and advanced management methods in evaluating performance and the performance of the Office's relationship with a citizen's life, since it takes him beyond the accepted service capabilities today, but it became budget duties between dealers servicing responsibilities and future planning, financial control, competitiveness, human resources needs and maintaining quality and continuous improvement and development as well as The primary role of the human resource in achieving continuous improvement, is the spirit of the principle underpinning the European Foundation for quality management excellence model design. Use the case study methodology researcher, through data collection checklist for evaluation in addition to interviews, the answer has been analysed using percentages and arithmetic, and indicate their strengths for the purpose of strengthening, and vulnerabilities for patch and calendar, and improvement opportunities to exploit and not to be missed. Special evaluation criteria were generally.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Articles submitted to the journal should not have been published before in their current or substantially similar form or be under consideration for publication with another journal. Please see JEAS originality guidelines for details. Use this in conjunction with the points below about references, before submission i.e. always attribute clearly using either indented text or quote marks as well as making use of the preferred Harvard style of formatting. Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unless otherwise agreed.
The editor may make use of Turnitin software for checking the originality of submissions received.