Evaluating of Improvement Level in Some of Diyala Governorate Departments according to the Eighth Requirement of Standard (ISO10006:2017)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33095/vbx07083Keywords:
ISO 10006:2017 , Quality Management, Improvement, : المواصفة (ISO10006:2017) ,ادارة المشاريع ,التحسين.Abstract
The research seeks to evaluate the reality of the level of improvement in a number of the Diyala governorate departments and to identify the gap between the actual reality of these departments and one of the requirements of the standard (ISO10006: 2017) through a case study of these departments, which are two departments (Engineering Construction and Buildings) which use tight checklists that are prepared according to the eighth requirement in the specification for improvement. The data are analyzed based on the seven-point Likert scale and statistical equations. The main result of this research at the engineering construction department is that the project management adopted documenting and analyzing the deviations depending on the importance of these deviations, where some minor deviations are dealt with simultaneously without documenting them. The main results at the Department of Buildings are the lack of a sufficient and integrated system for documentation that can be used by the project management, where the department did not specify the system that can be followed in projects and what the procedures for storage, preservation, and distribution, and the department did not develop a mechanism for improvement that can be followed to identify problems and treat them in order not to occur in the future.
Paper type: Research paper
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles submitted to the journal should not have been published before in their current or substantially similar form or be under consideration for publication with another journal. Please see JEAS originality guidelines for details. Use this in conjunction with the points below about references, before submission i.e. always attribute clearly using either indented text or quote marks as well as making use of the preferred Harvard style of formatting. Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unless otherwise agreed.
The editor may make use of Turnitin software for checking the originality of submissions received.