Comparison Between Tree regression (TR), and Negative binomial regression (NBR) by Using Simulation.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33095/jeas.v26i119.1896Keywords:
الانحدار الشجيري, انحدار ذي الحدين السالب , طريقة الإمكان الأعظم, المحاكاة.Abstract
In this paper, the process of comparison between the tree regression model and the negative binomial regression. As these models included two types of statistical methods represented by the first type "non parameter statistic" which is the tree regression that aims to divide the data set into subgroups, and the second type is the "parameter statistic" of negative binomial regression, which is usually used when dealing with medical data, especially when dealing with large sample sizes. Comparison of these methods according to the average mean squares error (MSE) and using the simulation of the experiment and taking different sample sizes where the results of simulation showed that the tree regression is best when the value of variance is large (5) and for all sample sizes model negative binomial regression when variance values (0.01, 0.5, 1) for all sample sizes, this method is superior to tree regression only when we take medium sample sizes.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles submitted to the journal should not have been published before in their current or substantially similar form or be under consideration for publication with another journal. Please see JEAS originality guidelines for details. Use this in conjunction with the points below about references, before submission i.e. always attribute clearly using either indented text or quote marks as well as making use of the preferred Harvard style of formatting. Authors submitting articles for publication warrant that the work is not an infringement of any existing copyright and will indemnify the publisher against any breach of such warranty. For ease of dissemination and to ensure proper policing of use, papers and contributions become the legal copyright of the publisher unless otherwise agreed.
The editor may make use of Turnitin software for checking the originality of submissions received.